기본 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

2nd week of Jan

Skidmore, A. K., et al. (2010). "Forage quality of savannas — Simultaneously mapping foliar protein and polyphenols for trees and grass using hyperspectral imagery." Remote Sensing of Environment 114(1): 64-72.
Canopy N was calculated just multiplying leaf N to LAI. In this paper, more precise estimate of canopy N was attributed to higher estimate of LAI. On leaf scale, the leaf structure itself did not account for leaf spectroscopy better than foliar traits. However, on UAV level, canopy structure affects to the spectroscopy directly.
라벨:

댓글

댓글 쓰기

이 블로그의 인기 게시물

4th week of june

Asner, G. P., Martin, R. E., Anderson, C. B., & Knapp, D. E. (2015). Quantifying forest canopy traits: Imaging spectroscopy versus field survey.  Remote Sensing of Environment ,  158 , 15-27. They use canopy sunlit reflectance at plot level and the trait samples from sunlit. The plot averaged refletance minimize canopy architectural effect. However actual field samples cover only 5% of a plot, the plot reflectance well explains canopy traits.
댓글 쓰기
자세한 내용 보기

AGU 2019

댓글 쓰기
자세한 내용 보기

2nd Week of August

Schaepman-Strub, Gabriela, et al. Reflectance quantities in optical remote sensing—Definitions and case studies. Remote sensing of environment 103.1 (2006) 27-42. If a surface was not an ideal specular or diffuse surface, one could observe diffuse light as well as specular light reflected off the surface. Reflectance is affected by where the incident light comes from and where the light is observed, which is represented by an angular distribution function. So different reflectance concepts are possible, so it is needed to use the term reflectance practically.
댓글 쓰기
자세한 내용 보기